[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

latest false flag attack?

On 09/24/2018 11:58 AM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:04:09 -0700
> Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>> On 09/23/2018 05:47 PM, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:13:36 +1000
>>>> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>>>>> None of which changes the fact the building was designed to withstand
>>>>> only
>>>>> three hours of uncontrolled fire
>>> On 2018-09-24 05:34, juan wrote:
>>>>     that is a fuckingly stupid lie that neither you nor agent
>>>> fairbrother can provide a source for.
>>> You are lying about sources, as you lied about the fall of building seven.
>> Well, it's not usually fun to argue with Juan. But I doubt that he
>> "lies", per se.
> 	Did you see the pictures I posted? Who is 'lying' about building 7 'toppling like a tree' ? 

Yes, I looked at all the pictures. And in my opinion, it's really hard
to tell exactly what's happening.

Also, as I've said, I don't really care. I strongly suspect that the US
government was somehow actively involved. Or at least, that it was a
rogue operation, involving such (maybe not really former) CIA assets as
Usama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Ladin and his associates. That is, it
was fundamentally a false-flag attack.

And if that's the case, it doesn't really matter what mix of planes,
missiles and demolition charges ended up doing the damage. That's rather
a distraction. What's interesting is who did it, and why.