[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

latest false flag attack?



On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:13:36 +1000
jamesd at echeque.com wrote:

> None of which changes the fact the building was designed to withstand 
> three hours of uncontrolled fire 


	that is a fuckingly stupid lie that neither you nor agent fairbrother can provide a source for. 

	By confusing the rating of the fire protection with some "time to collapse" of a whole building you should be regarded as semi literate at best. Or as fuckingly dishonest.


	last but not least, as can be inferred by the tons of smoke that came out of the building until the last minute, the fires were always lacking oxygen. 

	What's more, even the fuel that burned outside the building in a fireball produced a good deal of smoke because, guess what, kerosene doesn't burn too well even in open air. That is why it's puverized in a jet engine before burining it.



> not seven hours of uncontrolled fire, 

	'uncontrolled' fire means shit. 


> hence could be expected to collapse in much the way it did collapse.
>