[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

latest false flag attack?

On 09/23/2018 05:47 PM, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:13:36 +1000
>> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>>> None of which changes the fact the building was designed to withstand
>>> only
>>> three hours of uncontrolled fire
> On 2018-09-24 05:34, juan wrote:
>>     that is a fuckingly stupid lie that neither you nor agent
>> fairbrother can provide a source for.
> You are lying about sources, as you lied about the fall of building seven.

Well, it's not usually fun to argue with Juan. But I doubt that he
"lies", per se. He just has his own conception of reality, and won't
accept other perspectives ;)

> You lie about what everyone can see happened in 9/11

He is pushing a rather straight "truther" narrative here, I admit.

> The political function of your lies is to provide cover for a government
> program of importing male military age Muslim rapeugees from subsaharan
> Africa, and dumping them on marginal Republican federal electorates in
> flyover country, while turning a blind eye to their rapes and to  the
> fact that nearly all of them are living on crime and welfare.

It's arguable that Juan is nether red nor blue, but rather hates both.

I'm also nether red nor blue. But otherwise, we agree on little ;)