IPAM recommendations

• Subject: IPAM recommendations
• From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)
• Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 10:24:43 -0400
• In-reply-to: <CA+LTh[email protected]>
• References: <CA[email protected]> <CAB2RJyhs61B-cfJWfqnJA3D8ikdjWbkbPsW=fod2Q06vb4gDtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+LTh5UPadWphXwvm+H=c53nM8QB+iDDQoYA+cGZEXTiw024qQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB2RJyhQct[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA+LTh[email protected]>

On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:20:19 +0900, Mehmet Akcin said:

> I was using another product till few days ago (i wonâ??t mention name) i am
> not happy and decided to go with something open source

Can you mention why you're unhappy with the product?  Price, a critical
feature that was lacking, something else?

Software in a segment never improves unless the vendors/developers know
that doing XYZ well/poorly is a market differentiator....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190905/2787f199/attachment.sig>

• References:
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)

• Prev by Date: IPAM recommendations
• Next by Date: IPAM recommendations
• Previous by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Next by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread