[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: IPAM recommendations
- From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:20:19 +0900
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CA[email protected]> <CAB2RJyhs61B-cfJWfqnJA3D8ikdjWbkbPsW=fod2Q06vb4gDtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+LTh5UPadWphXwvm+H=c53nM8QB+iDDQoYA+cGZEXTiw024qQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB2RJyhQct[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Lets focus on the technology. Netbox is solid. I am leaning towards this
since its open source and there is some librenms integration.
I was using another product till few days ago (i wonâ??t mention name) i am
not happy and decided to go with something open source
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 21:16 Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:
> I donâ??t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog members
> ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the time, and since
> these products are right up the alley of Nanogâ??s mission â?? network
> operations â?? itâ??s a perfectly reasonable use of Nanog.
> But you read a single comment without researching any Nanog history, which
> would immediately show you how frequently Nanog serves in just this kind of
> valuable role, THATâ??S unkind.
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:56 AM, Todd Underwood <toddunder at gmail.com> wrote:
> i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog. if you have
> research to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great. this
> is especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information
> before asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
> you read a single web page and are asking nanog to do your homework for
> you. that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill
> of the community here. this is becoming a pattern. please either do some
> research yourself and start a conversation substantively, or look to paid
> consultants to evaluate your software/hardware/datacenter space/networking
> gear etc.
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>> Not much beyond this,
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder at gmail.com>
>>> What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
>>> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
>>> interesting findings so far?
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>>>> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
>>>> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
>>>> thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...