IPAM recommendations

• Subject: IPAM recommendations
• From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)
• Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 04:39:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
• References: <CA[email protected]>

What have you evaluated so far?  Can you share your evaluation grid, how
you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
interesting findings so far?

Thanks!

t

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:

> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
>
> thanks in advance.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190905/c4956f85/attachment.html>

• Follow-Ups:
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)

• References:
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)

• Prev by Date: IPAM recommendations
• Next by Date: IPAM recommendations
• Previous by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Next by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread