[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: IPAM recommendations
- From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 05:56:04 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CA+LTh[email protected]>
- References: <CA[email protected]> <CAB2RJyhs61B-cfJWfqnJA3D8ikdjWbkbPsW=fod2Q06vb4gDtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+LTh[email protected]>
i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog. if you have research
to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great. this is
especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information before
asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
you read a single web page and are asking nanog to do your homework for
you. that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill
of the community here. this is becoming a pattern. please either do some
research yourself and start a conversation substantively, or look to paid
consultants to evaluate your software/hardware/datacenter space/networking
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
> Not much beyond this,
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder at gmail.com> wrote:
>> What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
>> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
>> interesting findings so far?
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>>> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
>>> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
>>> thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...