[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mx204 alternative

Subject: Mx204 alternative
From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:15:24 +0100
In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CgG+[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7Ctjv[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAeewD9t5KGaMwbU=Kc4WFqPRJmrHnNRH63aK+zgbxB7Zi2Tww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA[email protected]>

> From: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 1:38 PM
> 
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025 at netconsultings.com> wrote:
> 
> > Not true.
> > This is the case only in fixed pipelines.
> 
> Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think of
> platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1) and MX
> Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS isn't expensive at
> all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the memory.
> 
I'm afraid I'd have to disagree. 

adam

References:
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com (Denys Fedoryshchenko)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: lukasz at bromirski.net (Łukasz Bromirski)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)

Prev by Date: Mx204 alternative
Next by Date: Weekly Routing Table Report
Previous by thread: Mx204 alternative
Next by thread: Mx204 alternative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread