Mx204 alternative

• Subject: Mx204 alternative
• From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
• Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:38:11 +0300
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CgG+[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7Ctjv[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAeewD9t5KGaMwbU=Kc4WFqPRJmrHnNRH63aK+zgbxB7Zi2Tww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025 at netconsultings.com> wrote:

> Not true.
> This is the case only in fixed pipelines.

Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think
of platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1)
and MX Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS
isn't expensive at all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the
memory.

-- 
  ++ytti

• Follow-Ups:
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)

• References:
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com (Denys Fedoryshchenko)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: lukasz at bromirski.net (Łukasz Bromirski)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
  • Mx204 alternative
    • From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)

• Prev by Date: Mx204 alternative
• Next by Date: Mx204 alternative
• Previous by thread: Mx204 alternative
• Next by thread: Mx204 alternative
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread