[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mx204 alternative

Subject: Mx204 alternative
From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:11:17 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
References: <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om>

> From: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 9:55 AM
> 
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 10:27, Å?ukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:
> 
> > 64B traffic simply doesnâ??t happen apart from DDoS scenarios, so why
> > bother at all? Customers anyway want to use dedicated
> 
> 
> And like you said, QoS and filters usually have 0 pps cost.
>
Not true.
This is the case only in fixed pipelines.


adam

Follow-Ups:
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)

References:
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com (Denys Fedoryshchenko)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: lukasz at bromirski.net (Łukasz Bromirski)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)

Prev by Date: Mx204 alternative
Next by Date: Mx204 alternative
Previous by thread: Mx204 alternative
Next by thread: Mx204 alternative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread