Cogent sales reps who actually respond

• Subject: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:04:43 -0700
• In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA[email protected]>

>>> 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
>>> 2. He.net peering battle. Google it.
>>> 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
>>>
>>> All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
>>
>> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to
>> peering, tech, ...  we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good
>> thing.
> 
> Can you elaborate on this? What are they doing/not doing that you take
> issue with?

i am not taking issue; the opposite.

cogent says that it peers v6 if and only if you are a v4 peer.  some
folk seem to think v6 peering should more more promiscuous.  they are
entitled to their opinions :)

• References:
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: stephen.myspam at gmail.com (Stephen M.)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: ross at tajvar.io (Ross Tajvar)

• Prev by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Previous by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread