Cogent sales reps who actually respond

• Subject: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:35:08 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 17:48 , Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
>> 2. He.net peering battle. Google it.
>> 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
>> 
>> All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
> 
> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to
> peering, tech, ...  we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good
> thing.
> 
> randy

Actually, their peering behavior in IPv4 is not quite as arrogant as it is in IPv6, so no, they arenâ??t doing parity.

Owen

• Follow-Ups:
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)

• References:
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: stephen.myspam at gmail.com (Stephen M.)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

• Prev by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Previous by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread