[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cogent sales reps who actually respond
- Subject: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
- From: stephen.myspam at gmail.com (Stephen M.)
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:59:18 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Please donâ??t praise or complain like weâ??re supposed to take it at a total face value. If you donâ??t like them so much - we are youâ??re audience. Explain.
If you like Cogent - explain.
If you donâ??t like Cogent - explain.
//please pardon any brevities - sent from mobile//
> On Sep 16, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
> ï»¿Whenever asked about Cogent, i just say, â??Friends donâ??t let friends use Cogent.â??
> Iâ??ve told two of their reps over the past two years that even if the service was free, i wouldnâ??t use it. And yet, they still call.
>>> On Sep 16, 2019, at 13:53, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>>> In message <E814E5F6-F386-4AAE-BADA-E423D299A4FB at delong.com>,
>>> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> Given their practice of harvesting whois updates in order to spam newly
>>> acquired AS contacts, any time it is my decision, Cogent is ineligible
>>> as a vendor.
>> So I guess then that their aiding and abetting of fraud and IP block
>> theft, as I documented here recently, is an entirely secondary concern...
>> as long as they don't spam you, yes?