Cogent sales reps who actually respond

• Subject: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• From: ross at tajvar.io (Ross Tajvar)
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:53:11 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

>
> > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
> > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it.
> > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
> >
> > All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
>
> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to
> peering, tech, ...  we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good
> thing.
>

Can you elaborate on this? What are they doing/not doing that you take
issue with?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190916/e474f7e7/attachment.html>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: ross at tajvar.io (Ross Tajvar)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

• References:
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: stephen.myspam at gmail.com (Stephen M.)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: mike.lyon at gmail.com (Mike Lyon)
  • Cogent sales reps who actually respond
    • From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

• Prev by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by Date: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Previous by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Next by thread: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread