Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
mcr> A good read, where are we going with this document?
> Potentially no where -- it may or may not get published as an RFC, but
> whatever the case, I've found it it be really helpful to have some
> thing like a problem statement document to make sure that everyone
> (newcomers and long time WG participants) are all working on the same
> page.
Yes. I'd like to ask that we consider is step one of outreach, and that we
consider making 7-12 slides to explain captive portal risks to:
1) marketing people.
2) end-users
3) computer programmers (not necessarily network people)
I'm thinking of something that could be done as a quick talk at another
conference, such as a pycon or XYZ User Group. Or maybe a Youtube video a la
Minute Physics.
I'll probably take a cut at this, but it will only help if we it looks good,
and I'm not in that category.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature