[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

latest false flag attack?



On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:40:52 +0100
Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:

> On 24/09/18 00:13, juan wrote:
> 
> > 	especially dedicated to agent fairbrother, 'expert' on metals
> > 
> > 
> > 	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGYrFxOL0vY
> 
> One ought to learn to sort out the obviously bullshit.
> 
> Begins: "Never before or after 9/11 have steel framed buildings 
> collapsed due to fire".
> 
> Unfortunately that is simply not true; nor relevant to what purports to 
> be a comparison between WTC and Windsor Tower, as Windsor Tower was not 
> steel-framed 

	oops - true. You must be happy you earned 1 debating point =)

	Still, speaking of obvious bullshit : 


> Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3 
> (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
	

	Did you show us the 'design docs' stating that 'WTC' would collapse after 3 hours? 

	for reference : 1 of the towers lasted 56 minutes, the other one  1 hour 40 minutes and building 7 stood for  ~7 hours. I guess "3" can mean anything then.