RE: what I've learned about cyanotype thru PDN

From: Loris Medici ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 06/06/05-06:33:42 AM Z
Message-id: <000c01c56a93$f99f2360$ce02500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

Hi Christina,

I don't know about Don's test (what he tested and how) but double
coating definitely changes Dmax with classic cyanotype. I get much much
stronger Dmax when I double coat. Also the contrast of the emulsion
changes considerably (it becomes more contrasty).

Regards,
Loris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:01 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: what I've learned about cyanotype thru PDN
>
>
> Thanks for posting this, Charles.
> I never double coated because I trusted Don Bryant's test
> from a couple
> years back which said it didn't make enough of a difference.
> Your page loaded fine, and quick for me.
> Question: what were your exposure times for the four? Or,
> 2:1 vs 1:1? Did
> you do a side by side test of all four at the same exact
> time? I love the
> side by side grid comparison. It's a "quick read".
> I am exposing my 2:1 for 6 minutes under UV, single coat. It
> is a beautiful
> deep thalo color, and not at all flat. I can send you a scan
> offlist (don't
> have a website yet up and running)
> Chris
Received on Mon Jun 6 06:32:14 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/07/05-11:30:54 AM Z CST