Re: tempera printing

From: Tim O'Neill ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 12/08/04-09:55:34 PM Z
Message-id: <BAY3-DAV29A6E1D6F685082E3467D7A0B70@phx.gbl>

HI Kate,

Are you using digital output for your neg or an imagesetter? If you are using an epson do you have a good working curve? I am starting form scratch there. If anyone has info that way it would be great. I have been using Dan B's curve for plat/pall with excellent results. Nothing yet for gum or tempera with digital output. Thoughts?

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Kate Mahoney<>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 5:07 PM
  Subject: Re: tempera printing

  Hi Tim, Peter Frederick has been very ill, and is in the process of

  I've just started using a modified version of his process with some success.
  The advantage is that it's way quicker to produce a print than gum - the
  disadvantage is (for me) that it produces a much different image quality.
  I'm just getting my head around the differences but I certainly find it
  simple and effective after gum, but then again it's probably because I have
  already done gum!!!

  Have a look at the archives - there was some discussion a couple of weeks
  ago and there are certainly a few much more knowledgeable people on this
  list than me!


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Tim O'Neill" <<>>
  To: <<>>
  Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 10:55 AM
  Subject: tempera printing

> Any one have contact info for Peter Fredrick? Or maybe any others out
> using his process I can compare some tests and notes with?
> Tim O'Neill
Received on Wed Dec 8 21:56:27 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/03/05-09:29:43 AM Z CST