[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Weekly Routing Table Report
Valdis KlÄ?tnieks wrote:
>> If you think we should blindly believe your unfounded statement
>> not supported by any verifiable reference, that is the
>> condescending behavior.
As you can see, that you finally mentioned rfc1518 as reference
helped a lot to suppress unfounded and, thus, useless messages
from you, because I verified the rfc to find that all of your
points are denied.
That's the point to have verifiable references.
> Well Masataka... If "Owen DeLong, who was widely known to have been in an
> actual job position to know of certain facts, stating these facts" isn't
> sufficient evidence for you,
I can't see any confirmed facts. Moreover, even if some of his point
on a single company might be valid, it is nothing for the discussion on
the entire Internet.
> then applying that very same standard of
> evidence to your assertions leads directly to "can safely be ignored"
As I already wrote:
> The following page by Geoff Huston is better than your delusion.
> What is driving this recent change to exponential growth
> of the routing table?
> In a word, multi-homing.
feel free to verify it.