[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peering with abusers...good or bad?
- Subject: Peering with abusers...good or bad?
- From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:24:58 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
- References: <CAEmG1=ow6z[email protected]> <CA[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CACWOCC_0bSMHu+n=nW0UG2mtppM71dbL0H-ysno6GdwnZZ=-Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BdvLwQuN51je6O-SSDRnCUf_Y+UEgDGqJvhVA0YsrMww@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BVk5OeCz9gXYFvx2SYOwYG8As=tovJEyUB-LQ9ZSut8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BHJeODPqH8y5jy4QciP+2xVNO7ywXpHzZSqUsCHQkAFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7AX6_[email protected]> <CA[email protected]>
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 at 01:23, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
wrote:
> So I want to buy additional ports at each IX. The slowest speed they offer.
> If I am lucky they have a free 100 Mbps. And then I just announce the
> prefix I want to blackhole. Doesn't matter that the port overloads. I am
> just going to null route the traffic anyway...
Sure, that works. Those are called â??choke portsâ??.
Kind regards,
Job
>