[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peering with abusers...good or bad?
- Subject: Peering with abusers...good or bad?
- From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 23:29:03 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
- References: <[email protected]om>
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:13 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Dan Hollis <goemon at sasami.anime.net>
> > OVH does not suprise me in the least.
> > Maybe this is finally what it will take to get people to de-peer them.
> If I de-peer them, I pay my upstream to carry the
> attack traffic.
Your isp will do rtbh
Your peers wont
> If I maintain peering with them, the attack traffic is free.
> It would seem the economics work the other way around.
> It would be more cost effective for me to identify the largest sources
> of attacks, and reach out to directly peer with them, to avoid paying
> an upstream to carry the traffic, if I'm going to end up throwing it
> away anyhow.