[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:50 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>> I never thought it was that bad. In some 3G/wireless networks in
>> the providers use NAT and transparent HTTP-proxy. But this is only
>> wireless. I'm not aware of any DSL or Cable provider NATing their
> Practically all broadband providers NAT their customers in the US. If
> you look at the largest ones which are probably Comcast, Verizon, and
> AT&T, you have the majority of US broadband subscribers right there.
Almost none of the broadband providers in the US NAT their customers.
Most of them provide a single public IP address to their residential
Most broadband customers use their own NAT to extend that single
public IP address from the provider to multiple addresses within
This is a very very different thing from LSN with a lot less breakage.