[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
In article <20110204225150.6FAC49B2854 at drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews
<marka at isc.org> writes
>> But NAT does have the useful (I think) side effect that I don't have to
>> renumber my network when I change upstream providers - whether that's
>> once every five years like I just did with my ADSL, or once every time
>> the new ADSL hiccups now that I have a CPE with 3G failover.
>>  Seems to be about weekly, so far.
>And that can be pretty much automated these days. Windows boxes
>if you let them will just register their new addresses in the DNS.
>MacOS also has the ability to do this as well. You should be asking
>the other vendors for similar support.
And when my vendor is Sipura, or Sony, how does an individual small
enterprise attract their attention and get the features added?
 Quite by accident I have three net-connected items of theirs, a
PS/3, a TV and a mobile phone.
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- From: bjohnson at drtel.com (Brian Johnson)
- From: lists at internetpolicyagency.com (Roland Perry)
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)