[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: quietly....
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:23:05 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
---- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Johnson" <bjohnson at drtel.com>
> This is exactly the problem we have. Some people have no perspective
> on what the Internet is and it's real power. I've met too many people
> who claim to be "in the know" on these topics that don't understand
> that NAT was designed for address preservation. That was the
> only/primary/driving real reason for its development. The other
> "features" were side effects and are not intended to be solutions to
> production issues.
"[were] not intended to be solutions to production issues" !=
"are not being depended on now".
> If I use a wrench to hammer nails, it may work fine, but when It comes
> to certain nails it may have issues. I'm using the tool for the wrong
> purpose. This is the folly of NAT.
Perhaps. But that's not important, now.
-- jr 'Good luck. We're all counting on you' a
- From: bjohnson at drtel.com (Brian Johnson)