[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-larose-capport-architecture



Just the draft should do, though it seems like the svg is handy.  If
we take long enough (I hope we don't), we could even include it in the
final RFC.

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Kyle Larose <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Erik, that repo is up to date. The only thing remaining is to rename the draft. The repo also has some stuff related to the last ietf meeting. Do you want it in the new repo as well?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Captive-portals [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Thomson
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:01 AM
> To: Erik Kline
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-larose-capport-architecture
>
> I've created a repository for the architecture draft at https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture
>
> I'll send a separate email with the process I think we should use for GitHub.
>
> Kyle and David, you have been invited to the repository.  If you need help setting the repository up, let me know (I found your repository at https://github.com/dcdolson/draft-capport-architecture and can do the setup if you like, once you confirm that this is up to date).
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote:
>> (long overdue update)
>>
>> There having been no dissent, objections, or concerns raised consensus
>> is that the group would like to adopt this document.
>>
>> Please re-upload draft-larose-capport-architecture-01 as
>> draft-ietf-capport-architecture-00.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On 30 August 2017 at 20:03, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> As indicated in the minutes from Prague
>>> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a
>>> general hum in favor of the architecture document:
>>>
>>>     """
>>>     1. for arch doc, do we want a milestone for architecture. Humming: in favor.
>>>     2. is the document a good basis for the milestone? Humming: in favor.
>>>     """
>>>
>>> This email is to initiate a two week adoption call for:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-larose-capport-architecture/
>>>
>>> Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals