[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection

I've created a repository for the architecture draft at

I'll send a separate email with the process I think we should use for GitHub.

Margaret, Mark, can you send me GitHub usernames so that I can add you
to the editors team?  If you are comfortable setting up the
repository, please do so.  If you like, you can send me the source and
I can set things up.

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote:
> (long overdue update)
> There having been no dissent, objections, or concerns raised consensus
> is that the group would like to adopt this document.
> Please re-upload draft-donnelly-capport-detection-02 with -ietf- in
> the name.  I might suggest changing the suffix to something like
> "-capport-api" (since this document is no longer about detection).
> (draft-ietf-capport-api-00)
> Thanks!
> On 30 August 2017 at 20:03, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote:
>> All,
>> As indicated in the minutes from Prague
>> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a
>> general hum in favor of the API document:
>>     """
>>     4. API document: do we need a milestone? Humming: in favor.
>>     5. Is this document a good basis. Humming in favor.
>>     """"
>> This email is to initiate a two week call for adoption for:
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-donnelly-capport-detection/
>> Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
>> Thanks,
>> -Erik