Re: Formaldehyde source (was Gum woes)

From: Scott Wainer ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 05/13/05-02:47:04 PM Z
Message-id: <002f01c557fc$f1b6c7b0$55affea9@scottho3aakafr>

Seeing as the filters were not expensive, I ordered the set specifically for
formaldehyde. Someone mentioned making sure that the respirator fit
correctly, I did a little test last night by removing the filter cartridges
and plugging up the holes - I was not able to breath with the holes plugged
up so it has a good fit. Everything should be ready by the time the
formaldehyde arrives and i'll see if it works better than the chrome alum or
the glyaxol.

Thanks again, Scott

swphoto@verizon.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Neilsen" <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: Formaldehyde source (was Gum woes)

> Scott, Why not call the company and ask their technical service people?
> While Kerik's suggestion is a good one, if the one you have provides
> protection, I am sure they will let you know.
>
> I did a search on the OSHA site or NITSA, don't recall for sure, a short
> while back. There was an extensive research area that spelled out what
mask
> did what. I didn't have a need to look up Formaldehyde, but I am sure it
is
> there. I try and look through the browser history and favorites to see if
> there is anything good for you. I think I found it by googling fume
> mask,OSHA standards.
>
> Eric Neilsen Photography
> 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
> Dallas, TX 75226
> 214-827-8301
> http://ericneilsenphotography.com
Received on Fri May 13 14:47:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 06/02/05-10:12:02 AM Z CST