Re: I kid you not, here's a new alt process

From: Michael Healy ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 01/17/04-11:09:25 PM Z
Message-id: <001401c3dd81$3e4bcaa0$0a0110ac@your24b0kwvrmn>

Aren't you in the Carolinas? Is that really a safe place to be talking about
the morphine & marijuana processes? Oh, wait. You spent all those years
getting jaded in Montana. I get it. Never mind.

Here I've been sweating that **I** might end up in the Ashcroft Files for
gathering materials for my uranium process.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
To: "Alt List" <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 8:53 PM
Subject: I kid you not, here's a new alt process

> I've hit the motherlode of all times; this week, I got 24 reels of the
> British Journal of Photography, from 1860 to 1910, for gum research, to
use
> until April. I'm in hog heaven, except my butt is gonna get so big,
sitting
> there for hours and hours watching microfilmed pages glide by (how off
topic
> can I get). Anyway, I had to report to you all a new process I came
across
> in 1867--the "morphine process". Now, granted, I didn't take the time to
> read thru it because I really have to be narrow in my search or else I'll
go
> crazy (this is 50 years of a weekly journal or 2600 journals) but the
first
> time I saw it go by I thought it was a joke, until it kept mentioning the
> process issue after issue. Maybe the current generation can start a
> marijuana process? Then again, maybe I'm the ONLY one on the list who
hasn't
> ever heard of this before.
> Chris
>
>
>
Received on Sat Jan 17 23:10:35 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:49:59 AM Z CST