[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Tomcat Monitoring

Looks like the script doesn't validate all required inputs.  There is an
option missing. It probably gets filled in my environment vars on the
shell, but isn't in the daemon startup.  Is there a JAVA_HOME missing?
Basically, check the shell env and the non-shell env. What is different?

On 10/06/2016 07:52 AM, Chuck Payne wrote:
> Getting back on track to the question I asked.
> It appears that if you use jmx you have to change tomcat, I don't have
> access to the setting.
> Has anyone used check_tomcat.pl, I am trying to get it working but
> getting the following error
> **ePN /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_tomcat.pl: "Use of uninitialized
> value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Getopt/Std.pm
> line 226,".
> The weird thing is that if I run on cli it works.
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:29 AM, DJ-Pfulio <DJPfulio at jdpfu.com> wrote:
>> Can't help with residential. Things are different there.
>> I have a static /29 on biz and treat their router/modem like a
>> bridge/gateway.  MY router is setup for the public /29 subnet. No
>> double-NAT at that layer.
>> Their router is my gateway with a single address. Put a non-secured,
>> cheapo, wifi router into one of the comcast ports, it gets a 10.x.x.x
>> DHCP address and works for guests.
>> I suspect the tech was right. Disable DHCP and the firewall on the WAN
>> side.  For common things, the techs are usually right.
>> On 10/05/2016 05:41 PM, Chris Fowler wrote:
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     *From: *"DJ-Pfulio" <DJPfulio at jdpfu.com>
>>>     *To: *ale at ale.org
>>>     *Sent: *Tuesday, October 4, 2016 7:13:47 PM
>>>     *Subject: *Re: [ale] Tomcat Monitoring
>>>     However, be certain to get them to disable the Xfinity wifi crap. I
>>>     watched the tech do it and the following day it was back on. Seems we
>>>     have to call and complain a few times until they alter the router setup
>>>     at their end to really disabled it.
>>> The biz tech replaced my supplied modem with theirs today.  She knew her
>>> cable, but not layer 2 vs layer 3 and my issue with this new modem is
>>> that it is layer 3 type device.  My original modem was just a "bridge".
>>>   She told me to turn on "bridge" mode all I needed to do was disable
>>> DHCP and turn off firewall.  No, not really.  What I did was assign my
>>> router a static on address that this modem is on and
>>> configure that static address for DMZ.
>>> Is this good enough to give me the benefits of layer 2 or should I just
>>> replace it with my own and send it back?
>>> With that DMZ it should just be DNAT/SNAT for everything on the public.
>>>  Double NAT issues should not really cause a problem. I do something
>>> similar when I assign a lab device a public IP from my private net.  On
>>> a system at Peak 10 I alias another public on its eth0.  I run openvpn
>>> on the device with the 10.8.1.X subnet and then use DNAT/SNAT to
>>> "assign" that public to the device.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo

Got Linux? Used on smartphones, tablets, desktop computers, media
centers, and servers by kids, Moms, Dads, grandparents and IT