sfps from fs dot com

• Subject: sfps from fs dot com
• From: jason+nanog at lixfeld.ca (Jason Lixfeld)
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:58:36 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <A[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bryan Holloway <bryan at shout.net> wrote:
> 
> In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it can be a "successful" business model.

> For someone who doesn't want to deal with outages, call-volume, hands tickets, truck-rolls, and has money to burn, there are better alternatives.

Indeed.  My tune would be very different if we had 1:50 fail in the field.

• Follow-Ups:
  • sfps from fs dot com
    • From: neil at shrug.pw (Neil Hanlon)

• References:
  • sfps from fs dot com
    • From: nwarren at barryelectric.com (Nicholas Warren)
  • sfps from fs dot com
    • From: jason+nanog at lixfeld.ca (Jason Lixfeld)
  • sfps from fs dot com
    • From: bryan at shout.net (Bryan Holloway)

• Prev by Date: sfps from fs dot com
• Next by Date: sfps from fs dot com
• Previous by thread: sfps from fs dot com
• Next by thread: sfps from fs dot com
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread