[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?
The fact that the port authority building is also an office building with multiple other tenants?
Whois contacts on a defunct domain belonging to an Australian government port authority agency thatâ??s since been renamed donâ??t appear to support your hypothesis that this is another tenant of a government owned building.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2019 5:30 AM
To: Ronald F. Guilmette
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?
Iâ??m just saying that I randomly checked one fact and it doesnâ??t meet the level of positive certainty that you asserted. Itâ??s thus reasonable to ask you to double check your research all around. Iâ??m not willing to be your unpaid copy editor, so let me know when youâ??ve done a double check and Iâ??ll be willing to invest time in your story again.
-mel via cell
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
> In message <23540.1567802066 at segfault.tristatelogic.com>, I wrote:
>> Is anyone disputing that 220.127.116.11/16 belongs to the Australian
>> national government, or that AS174, Cogent was, until quite recently,
>> routing that down to their pals at FDCServers who then were routing
>> it down to their customer, Elad Cohen? If so, I ask that people look
>> up this network in the RIPE Routing history tool and ALSO that folks
>> have a look at, and explain, the following traceroute from August 23:
> My apologies. In my furious haste, I botched that one URL. Here is the
> correct file conatining my traceroute to 18.104.22.168 as performed by
> me on August 23rd:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...