[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mx204 alternative

Subject: Mx204 alternative
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 12:26:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAO1bj[email protected]>
References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=ZsOC[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj[email protected]>

On 2/Sep/19 11:24, Aled Morris wrote:

>
>
> Sorry I have no inside info, only what's been released publicly.

We stayed away from the ACX5000 because the Broadcom chip in there
wasn't great for high-touch services.

I hope this ACX700 has a better plan.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190902/afdfcc01/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: ghenry at suretec.co.uk (Gavin Henry)

References:
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: aled.w.morris at googlemail.com (Aled Morris)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Mx204 alternative
  - From: aled.w.morris at googlemail.com (Aled Morris)

Prev by Date: Mx204 alternative
Next by Date: Mx204 alternative
Previous by thread: Mx204 alternative
Next by thread: Mx204 alternative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread