Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

• Subject: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
• Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:34:44 -0400
• In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA[email protected]>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 06:31:08PM -0700, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:06 PM John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
> 
> > I assumed that something this sleazy would be offshore, but their
> > terms of service say they're in Los Angeles.
> >
> 
> They tricked you. [snip]

Also, unless I'm misreading their site, they expect users to download/run
an application program of unknown provenance and function, from an operation
that has gone to great lengths to conceal its location and principals.
What could possibly go wrong?

---rsk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)

• References:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

• Prev by Date: Regarding the ARIN Advisory Council and ARIN PDP (was: Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation)
• Next by Date: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Previous by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread