Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

• Subject: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:31:08 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:06 PM John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

> I assumed that something this sleazy would be offshore, but their
> terms of service say they're in Los Angeles.
>

They tricked you.

https://packetstream.io/legal/privacy

PacketStream
8605 Santa Monica Blvd
Los Angeles, CA, 90069
support at packetstream.io

https://www.earthclassmail.com/addresses/ca/west-hollywood

"Get a real West Hollywood address at 8605 Santa Monica Blvd, West
Hollywood, CA 90069-4109, US for your business, then get your mail online -
as easy as..."

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190426/2eefb58b/attachment.html>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)

• References:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)

• Prev by Date: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation
• Next by Date: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation
• Previous by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread