[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> The intent is to clearly state that this is a violation of the policies.
>
> The membership documents/bylaws or the RSA, your account may be closed.
> I looked at it when adapting the policy from RIPE to ARIN, don't have
> this information right in my mind, but I'm sure it was there.
>
> Otherwise, if needed another policy should state something like "if you
> keep violating policies" this and that may happen. This should be
> something generic for *any* policy violation not in general. We have
> this in RIPE and LACNIC, and I'm also convinced that in APNIC and
> AFRINIC (still working on those versions).
Not swip'ing your IPs is also a violation of the agreement, but until you
go back to ARIN for more IPs (opps, they're out), that's not an issue. I
see this policy as pointless as written because it doesn't say that ARIN
will take any action other than publishing an opinion. I think you're
also assuming there's a pool of experts standing by willing to investigate
every alleged hijacking (for free?). Maybe there are. If there aren't,
or once they get tired of investigating allegations, what then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________