[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> So providers should stamp this out (because it is â??badâ??) and support customers who are running TOR nodes (because those are â??goodâ??). Did I get that right?

If that is how you see it, then it's right for you.  At no time did I mention TOR, nor will I get dragged into that discussion.


Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS
California Bar Association
Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Colorado Cyber Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose