Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

• Subject: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• From: amitchell at isipp.com (Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.)
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:40:46 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om>

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> 
> So providers should stamp this out (because it is â??badâ??) and support customers who are running TOR nodes (because those are â??goodâ??). Did I get that right?

If that is how you see it, then it's right for you.  At no time did I mention TOR, nor will I get dragged into that discussion.

Anne

Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS
California Bar Association
Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Colorado Cyber Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose

• Follow-Ups:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)

• References:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: mis at seiden.com (Mark Seiden)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: kscott.helms at gmail.com (K. Scott Helms)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: beecher at beecher.cc (Tom Beecher)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: amitchell at isipp.com (Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.)
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)

• Prev by Date: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next by Date: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Previous by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread