[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Special Counsel Office report web site

Oh spiffy! 

Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then.

-Mike

> On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson <brett at the-watsons.org> wrote:
> 
> Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :) 
> 
> 
> bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203
> ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> 
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;cia.gov.			IN	NS
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a22-66.akam.net.
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a16-67.akam.net.
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a1-22.akam.net.
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a12-65.akam.net.
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a3-64.akam.net.
> cia.gov.		86400	IN	NS	a13-65.akam.net.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It certainly is. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Isnâ??t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized...
>>> 
>>> -Mike
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <mis at seiden.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
>>>> 
>>>> (iâ??ve been surprised that it hasnâ??t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet.  â??russiar, are you listening?â??)
>>>> 
>>>> (i sure hope thereâ??s a signed version or at least a hash.)
>>>> 
>>>> i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and malware inserted that are distributed as well.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> and iâ??ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed that way.
>>>>> On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>, wrote:
>>>>> And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-)
>>>>> More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, amd-64 Branch prediction.
>>>>> Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for hypervisors
>>>>> 
>>>>> And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole thing to a a screeching halt
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>>>>>> Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved
>>>>>> ways
>>>>>>> of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it â??slash-dot
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> insuranceâ??, but the idea is the same.) Specifically:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the
>>>>>> Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern
>>>>>> running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Frederick Wessling (CIO)
>>>>> Succinct Systems LLC
>>>>> Cell: +1(561) 571-2799
>>>>> Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925
>>>>> Fax: +1(904) 758-9987
>>>>> www.SuccinctSystems.com
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190417/b76c03ae/attachment.html>