[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand

+1 on this. its been more than 10 years since I've been responsible for a
broadband network but have friends that still play in that world and do
some very good work on making sure their models are very well managed, with
more math than I ever bothered with, That being said, If had used the
methods I'd had used back in the 90's they would have fully predicted per
sub growth including all the FB/YoutubeNetflix traffic we have today. The
"rapid" growth we say in the 90's and the 2000' and even this decade are
all magically the same curve, we'd just further up the incline, the
question is will it continue another 10+ years, where the growth rate is
nearing straight up :)


On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:26 PM Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Tom Ammon wrote:
> > Netflow for historical data is great, but I guess what I am really
> > asking is - how do you anticipate the load that your eyeballs are going
> > to bring to your network, especially in the face of transport tweaks
> > such as QUIC and TCP BBR?
> I don't see how QUIC and BBR is going to change how much bandwidth is
> flowing.
> If you want to make your eyeballs happy then make sure you're not
> congesting your upstream links. Aim for max 50-75% utilization in 5 minute
> average at peak hour (graph by polling interface counters every 5
> minutes). Depending on your growth curve you might need to initiate
> upgrades to make sure they're complete before utilization hits 75%.
> If you have thousands of users then typically just look at the statistics
> per user and extrapolate. I don't believe this has fundamentally changed
> in the past 20 years, this is still best common practice.
> If you go into the game of running your links full parts of the day then
> you're into the game of trying to figure out QoE values which might mean
> you spend more time doing that than the upgrade would cost.
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190402/27fd3cea/attachment.html>