[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OpenDNS CGNAT Issues
On 09/11/2018 09:31 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> So don't CGNat? Buy IPv4 addresses at auction?
Buy IPv4 addresses until CGN is cheaper. If a customer has to call, and
you have to assign an IPv4 address, you have to recover the cost of that
call and address.
While ((CostOfCall + CostOfAddress)*NumberOfCalls) >
(CostOfAddress*NumberOfNewCustomers):
    BuyAddresses(NumberOfNewCustomers)
Meanwhile, deploy IPv6, and move toward IPv4aaS, probably 464xlat or
MAP, but your religion may vary. That way your "CGN" is an IPv6-IPv4
translator, and that's easier than managing dual-stack.
At the very least, dual-stack your web sites now, so the rest of us can
get to it without translation.
Lee
>
> On 9/11/18 9:28 AM, Ca By wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 6:04 AM Matt Hoppes
>> <mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net
>> <mailto:mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Â Â Â That isnâ??t a solution. He still will need to dual stack and CGNat
>> that.
>>
>>
>> But the flows that can support ipv6, will go ipv6 and not be subject
>> to these abuse triggers.
>>
>> Look, this list has monthly reports from some small network operator
>> hurting their customers with CGN NAT. Meanwhile, the big guys like
>> Comcast / Charter / ATT / Cox have moved onto ipv6.
>>
>> Where does that leave the little guy with CGN?
>>
>> Right here. Screaming into the avoid begging for help. Some special
>> exception.
>>
>> And, me, saying you had 10+ years of not deploying ipv6. Hereâ??s to
>> the next 10 years of you email this list about your own failure to
>> keep up with the times.
>>
>> We will have this discussion again and again. Not sure your
>> customers will stick around, all they know is your CGN space got
>> black listed from yet another service
>>
>> #realtalk
>>
>>
>> Â Â Â On Sep 11, 2018, at 08:54, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com
>> Â Â Â <mailto:cb.list6 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Â Â Â On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:12 PM Darin Steffl
>>> Â Â Â <darin.steffl at mnwifi.com <mailto:darin.steffl at mnwifi.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Hello,
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I have a ticket open with OpenDNS about filtering happening on
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â some of our CGNAT IP space where a customer has "claimed" the
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â IP as theirs so other customers using that same IP and OpenDNS
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â are being filtered and not able to access sites that fall
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â under their chosen filter.
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I have a ticket open from 6 days ago but it's not going
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â anywhere fast.
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Can someone from OpenDNS contact me or point me to a contact
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â there to help get this resolved? I believe we need to claim
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â our CGNAT IP space so residential users can't claim IP's of
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â their own.
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>> Â Â Â You should provide your users ipv6, opendns supports ipv6 and
>>> Â Â Â likely will not have this issue you see
>>>
>>> Â Â Â https://www.opendns.com/about/innovations/ipv6/
>>>
>>> Â Â Â I am sure it may cost you time / money / effort. But this old
>>> Â Â Â thing we call ipv4 is in a death spiral, and it will just get
>>> Â Â Â worse and worse for you without ipv6.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -- Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Darin Steffl
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Minnesota WiFi
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 507-634-WiFi
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>>>
>
>