[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
- Subject: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
- From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard)
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:53:49 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 06/17/2018 02:53 PM, Brad wrote:
> While I agree there are unintended consequences every time advancements are made in relation to the security and stability of the Internet- I disagree we should be rejecting their implementations. Instead, we should innovate further.
I look forward to your innovations.
> Just because end to end encryption causes bandwidth issues for a very small number users - then perhaps they could benefit the most by these changes with additional capacity.
I encourage you to invest billions of dollars in rural broadband
capacity worldwide. The rest of us will thank you for your sacrifice.
> -------- Original message --------From: Michael Hallgren <mh at xalto.net> Date: 6/17/18 11:14 (GMT-07:00) To: nanog at jack.fr.eu.org Cc: Matthew Petach <matt at petach.org>, nanog at nanog.org Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
> Le 2018-06-17 12:40, nanog at jack.fr.eu.org a Ã©critÂ :
>> Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption
> Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with
>> On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>>> Except that if websites are set to HTTPS only, there's no option for
>>> disabling encryption on the client side.
>>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 14:47 <nanog at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
>>>> On 06/16/2018 10:13 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>>> Sadly, it's just falling on deaf ears. Silicon Valley will continue
>>>> think they know better than everyone else and people outside of that
>>>> will continue to be disadvantaged.
>>>> What, again ?
>>>> Encryption is what is best for the most people.
>>>> The few that will not use it can disable it.
>>>> No issue then.