[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
- Subject: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 14:47:45 -0500 (CDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
If additional capacity were something feasible, it would be done.
Intelligent Computing Solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad" <brad at persius.net>
To: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 1:53:52 PM
Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
While I agree there are unintended consequences every time advancements are made in relation to the security and stability of the Internet- I disagree we should be rejecting their implementations. Instead, we should innovate further.
Just because end to end encryption causes bandwidth issues for a very small number users - then perhaps they could benefit the most by these changes with additional capacity.
-------- Original message --------From: Michael Hallgren <mh at xalto.net> Date: 6/17/18 11:14 (GMT-07:00) To: nanog at jack.fr.eu.org Cc: Matthew Petach <matt at petach.org>, nanog at nanog.org Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)
Le 2018-06-17 12:40, nanog at jack.fr.eu.org a Ã©crit :
> Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption
Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with
> On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>> Except that if websites are set to HTTPS only, there's no option for
>> disabling encryption on the client side.
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 14:47 <nanog at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2018 10:13 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>> Sadly, it's just falling on deaf ears. Silicon Valley will continue
>>> think they know better than everyone else and people outside of that
>>> will continue to be disadvantaged.
>>> What, again ?
>>> Encryption is what is best for the most people.
>>> The few that will not use it can disable it.
>>> No issue then.