3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco

• Subject: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
• From: phil.lavin at cloudcall.com (Phil Lavin)
• Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:40:00 +0000
• In-reply-to: <SN1PR06MB17421[email protected]>
• References: <CA+YLC8jFct-[email protected]>, <SN1PR06MB17421[email protected]>

I concur. Never bought Cisco 100G from them but the quality of the Juniper optics and other ancillary fibre stuff is great.


> On 5 Jun 2018, at 20:58, Mitcheltree, Harold B <pete at ots.utsystem.edu> wrote:
> 
> FS.COM
> 
> 
> --Pete
> 
> ________________________________
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of Ryugo Kikuchi <ringostarr0706 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:48:16 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for
> Cisco ASR and Nexus?
> 
> Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try to
> use 3rd party 100g SFP.
> But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good
> performance.
> 
> Does anyone have experience?
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Roy

• References:
  • 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
    • From: pete at ots.utsystem.edu (Mitcheltree, Harold B)

• Prev by Date: Satelite Internet Provider
• Next by Date: VPP-based router vs Hardware assisted ones
• Previous by thread: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
• Next by thread: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread