[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MTU to CDN's
- Subject: MTU to CDN's
- From: bernat at luffy.cx (Vincent Bernat)
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> (Mike Hammett's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:07:09 -0600 (CST)")
- References: <CA[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-FO7QLty2o9KUdHSbdYay8e1cNtDk96eFhhMZL9Ckc8fw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-H3nT[email protected]> <[email protected]> <2016421856.844.1516369686950.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
â?¦ 19 janvier 2018 08:07 -0600, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net>Â :
> Wouldn't those situations be causing issues now, given the likelihood
> that someone with a less than 1,500 byte MTU is communicating with you
> now?
Those situations are causing issues now. If you have a MTU less than
1500 bytes, it is likely some destination are unreachable to you if you
only rely on PMTUD. People usually rely on TCP MSS for those cases.
--
I'll burn my books.
-- Christopher Marlowe