[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MTU to CDN's
- Subject: MTU to CDN's
- From: bernat at luffy.cx (Vincent Bernat)
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> (Mike Hammett's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:07:09 -0600 (CST)")
- References: <CA[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-FO7QLty2o9KUdHSbdYay8e1cNtDk96eFhhMZL9Ckc8fw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-H3nT[email protected]> <[email protected]> <2016421856.844.1516369686950.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
â?¦ 19 janvier 2018 08:07 -0600, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net>Â :
> Wouldn't those situations be causing issues now, given the likelihood
> that someone with a less than 1,500 byte MTU is communicating with you
Those situations are causing issues now. If you have a MTU less than
1500 bytes, it is likely some destination are unreachable to you if you
only rely on PMTUD. People usually rely on TCP MSS for those cases.
I'll burn my books.
-- Christopher Marlowe