[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

MTU to CDN's

Subject: MTU to CDN's
From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:18:47 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
References: <CAM3TTh3-H4s3iJS4JDydPHnGyRy1a+j8H8HjDTHHudkexZ1PQg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-FO7QLty2o9KUdHSbdYay8e1cNtDk96eFhhMZL9Ckc8fw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-H3nTtRxvBiC_M6O+w=dt27cks7tBO0WYanr74pS-g8zw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <2016421856.844.1516369686950.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <1786714545.880.1516370827342.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Mike Hammett wrote:

> Wouldn't those situations be causing issues now, given the likelihood 
> that someone with a less than 1,500 byte MTU is communicating with you 
> now?

If the issue is that you're letting 8996 byte packets through but not 9000 
byte packets, then no.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

References:
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: dovid at telecurve.com (Dovid Bender)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: bernat at luffy.cx (Vincent Bernat)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: michael at wi-fiber.io (Michael Crapse)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- MTU to CDN's
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)

Prev by Date: MTU to CDN's
Next by Date: MTU to CDN's
Previous by thread: MTU to CDN's
Next by thread: MTU to CDN's
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread