Stupid Question maybe?

[saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 21:06, Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:

> Do you have /24 cover prefixes advertised to the Internet?

Yes, just it drops at the peering edge as more specific is not found.

> $EMPLOYER requires globally routable access to the link net IP on our
> equipment for specific configurations.  Sorry, I can't go into details.
>
> I'm trying to ascertain if the configuration (as I understand it) that
> advocating for would work for us or not.

Would require details, but I believe the host/32 pointing to interface
(no next-hop IP) ought to  do the trick.

-- 
  ++ytti