Stupid Question maybe?

[gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)]

On 12/20/2018 10:55 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Correct.

Do you have /24 cover prefixes advertised to the Internet?

> What is that use-case? Do notice that I propose opt-in static host/32 
> route pointing to the link, giving far-end INET reachability, if they 
> so want, without adding attack surface on the near-end.

$EMPLOYER requires globally routable access to the link net IP on our 
equipment for specific configurations.  Sorry, I can't go into details.

I'm trying to ascertain if the configuration (as I understand it) that 
advocating for would work for us or not.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181220/1e24fd73/attachment.bin>