[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Internet topology resources
- Subject: Internet topology resources
- From: lprehn at inet.tu-berlin.de (Lars Prehn)
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:35:08 +0200
- In-reply-to: <6kTEg1kfpOStaDIePeg2egEGHDUFYleu5z0vKOg2B6FWfu_8q5t3s3cl-_lvU65[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <6kTEg1kfpOStaDIePeg2egEGHDUFYleu5z0vKOg2B6FWfu_8q5t3s3cl-_lvU65[email protected]>
No. Visualizing AS paths, as such, is not planned within the scope of my
thesis :)
However, I'm really interested in getting an accurate snapshot of the
current Internet's AS-level topology. The topology-related data
ThousandEyes collects would fit my needs perfectly. If anyone may be
able to provide similar data for academic research purposes I would
really appreciate receiving a mail.
Best regards,
Lars
Am 26.04.18 um 20:33 schrieb Timothy Manito:
> Is this some sort of BGP AS Path Visualization like what ThousandEyes
> are doing?
>
>
> Sent from ProtonMail mobile
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Apr 26, 2018, 4:46 PM, Lars Prehn < lprehn at inet.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> two quick questions:
>
> Is there any way to retrieve BGP data (e.g. table dumps, updates,
> ...)
> such that i.) the data is not already available in the RIPE RIS,
> Routeviews, PCH, Isolario, or BGPmon projects and ii.) it is not
> necessary to query a Looking Glass to death (e.g. get all
> neighbors, for
> each neighbor get all prefixes, for each prefix get all
> announcements)?
>
> Are there any traceroute (or related) projects that currently
> still make
> their data publically available except for MLAB, RIPE Atlas,
> Caida, the
> Bismark Projekt, the portolan project?
>
>
> In addition, if you know somebody that knows somebody (...) that
> probably might be capable of giving me access to an IXP Route Server
> dump, a set of traceroutes that is not published publically yet, or
> something related I would *really* appreciate if you could forward me
> the contact! :) All data is supposed to be used in a research
> context,
> more specific my master thesis, therefore I would also accept
> annonymized data as long as it still contains useful topology
> information.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lars
>