[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Arista unqualified SFP

Subject: Arista unqualified SFP
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:18:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CA[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <239960167-1471519756-cardhu_decombobulator[email protected]> <[email protected]>


On 18/Aug/16 13:47, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:

> Same here, i was considering Arista, because they are quite cost
> effective,feature rich, interesting hardware for developing some
> custom solutions. But no more, after reading about unreasonable vendor
> lock-in.
> But such inflexibility are very bad sign, this "openness" looks like
> marketing only, under the hood it seems worse than other solutions on
> market. Also when support shows such inflexibility, it is very bad
> sign. And very sad.

Don't be too hasty. See my response earlier.

Mark.

References:
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: me at nek0.net (Stanislaw)
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: jackson.tim at gmail.com (Tim Jackson)
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: me at nek0.net (Stanislaw)
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: me at nek0.net (Stanislaw)
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: dovid at telecurve.com (Dovid Bender)
- Arista unqualified SFP
  - From: denys at visp.net.lb (Denys Fedoryshchenko)

Prev by Date: Arista unqualified SFP
Next by Date: Arista unqualified SFP
Previous by thread: Arista unqualified SFP
Next by thread: Arista unqualified SFP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread