High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel

• Subject: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
• From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
• Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 20:32:55 -0400
• In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 May 2013 16:42:23 -0700." <[email protected]>
• References: <CAGWRaZb_dHnFHzOZ45M-OkxhbHLjAp=f57fkSkD3fW3FyZP_5g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGWRaZaMup2nx-K3Sc6d3FZNHB7xSTPONgOHEggLJYVtDkvEPg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:42:23 -0700, Seth Mattinen said:
> On 5/19/13 4:27 PM, Ben wrote:
> > Do you actually need stateful filtering?  A lot of people seem to think
> > that it's important, when really they're accomplishing little from it,
> > you can block ports etc without it.
>
>
> I believe PCI compliance requires it, other things like it probably do too.

It's the rare ISP who's border routers are in-scope for PCI compliance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130519/31b8988c/attachment.bin>

• References:
  • High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
    • From: symack at gmail.com (Nick Khamis)
  • High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
    • From: symack at gmail.com (Nick Khamis)
  • High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
    • From: ben at meh.net.nz (Ben)
  • High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
    • From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)

• Prev by Date: What hath god wrought?
• Next by Date: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
• Previous by thread: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
• Next by thread: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread