[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500, Jack Bates said:

> They are not, and I can think of quite a few people who would stare
> blankly at you for making such a statement. Of course, I can think of
> plenty of people who we'd like to see implementing BCP38 concepts that
> would need you to define ingress and egress.

Of course, the fact they don't understand ingress and egress are *totally*
unrelated to the fact they can't figure out how to deploy BCP38, correct?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130327/4f5a7fe9/attachment.bin>